![]() |
Cardiff North Liberal Democrats Campaigning for Cardiff North |
![]() |
|
|
Cardiff North Liberal Democrats | <info@cardiffnorthlibdems.org.uk> | 9th September 2010 |
John Dixon signs code of conduct for general election6.14.00pm GMT Mon 15th Mar 2010
Following the controversy surrounding MPs allowances last year, all Welsh Liberal Democrat candidates will sign a Code of Conduct on Elected Members' Allowances and Transparency. The Code of Conduct states that no MP should profit from the tax-payer with regard to their allowances and that there should be complete transparency in how allowances are spent. John Dixon said: "If elected to Parliament, I will ensure complete transparency, especially when it comes to taxpayers' money. I want voters in Cardiff North to have 100% confidence in my commitment to fair, honest and transparent politics. This Code of Conduct provides that guarantee. "The Welsh Liberal Democrats want a fresh start for Wales and we want to regain the trust of the people who send us to work on their behalf. This is a first step towards that goal. "The Welsh Liberal Democrats want to clean up politics completely, by changing the voting system so that there are no more safe seats, and by giving voters the power to sack their MP if they have been found to act corruptly.'
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Sat 1st May 2010: 3 reasons to vote for John Dixon and the Lib Dems! Fri 23rd Apr 2010: John Dixon's campaign - how you can help! Mon 11th Jan 2010: John Dixon puts fairness at the heart of the Liberal Democrat campaign. Wed 18th Nov 2009: John Dixon's response to the Queen's Speech. Fri 30th Oct 2009: Government should listen to experts on drugs says John Dixon. Tue 6th Oct 2009: Osborne's speech signals a return to the bad old days - John Dixon . Wed 23rd Sep 2009: John Dixon - Lib Dem conference shows we are addressing the real issues . Sat 26th Apr 2008: Published and promoted by Cardiff North Liberal Democrats, 99 Woodville Road, Cardiff CF24 4DY. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |